GOD vs More, More, More

(God vs More, More, More)

This is the bread (manna) that God is giving you to eat…They (the Israelites) gathered exactly enough for each one to eat. Moses announced to them, ‘Let no man leave any over until morning. Some men did not listen to Moses and left a portion over for the morning. It (the manna) became putrid and maggoty with worms…When Friday came, what they gathered turned out to be a double portion of food (for there is no gathering on Shabbat)

Exodus 16:16-22

            Fear of extinction and or pain motivates man to acquisition (derivative more, more, more) and consequentially from faith in God being primary.

             If man believed and knew that now and in the future he would be provided for – would man still seek ‘more, more, more’ (whether it is tangible goods or services or a medium of exchange ((money)) for goods and services)?

            Yes, as proven historically & repeatedly he’d seek extra manna (‘manana manna’© aka more – just in case – placing it into a Rubbermaid™ or Debbie Meyer™ ziplock to try to overcome the rotting).

            Even in the desert, the spies feared the Canaanites more than they had faith in God (regardless of witnessing the splitting of the Sea of Reeds, plagues etc) stating, ‘they are giants and we are grasshoppers.’ Further’more,’,the translation ‘they (the Canaanites) are stronger than we’ (Numbers 13:31) in Sotah 35a the interpreted version of the text is ‘they are stronger than Him.’

            Is it any wonder, man (especially those seeking 501c(4)’s tax exemption with the words Patriot’ and “Tea Party” in their application) fears the IRS more than they fear, are in awe, or have faith in Hashem?

            Man chooses & seeks the myth of ‘more’ to douse or palliate the fear of extinction its anxiety and anticipatory pain over faith. Derivatively, man seeks materially more as he defines himself comparatively to others rather than use the material to continue to complete his spiritual incompletions. Alternatively, man insulates himself in the spiritual (enclaves, monasteries) or the faux spiritual (The Cumbaya Democrat Party) to avoid ‘adulteration’ but in reality fails in his task of spiritualizing the material.

            In the desert, man was provided with manna/food (that took on the taste of that which he desired), had shelter, clothes that never wore out (nor had to be bought at Abercombe & Fitch to be cool), didn’t have to worry about the adequacy of his 401k  when the US or Tokyo stock market went down 400 points,  and had Almightycare (unlike Obamacare no rationing and the tribal leaders couldn’t opt out) (2). And yet the Israelites complained, bitched and kvetched – “we fondly remember the fish that we could eat in Egypt at no cost, along with the cucumbers, melons, leeks, onions and garlic”  Numbers 11:5.

In God We Trust (all others pay cash)

Wisecrack

           

            Then and now, there is never enough. God – Shaddai – is never enough (though ‘believe in God just to cover one’s bets). God is ‘just in case.’

            Yet, current currencies change and can become devalued by printing money etc. There is always ‘something’ to fear – such that there is ‘never enough’ as there can never be enough when there is ‘always something’ and another ‘if only.’ (Solve ‘if only #1 and if only #2 is promoted along with another ‘something’ to be concerned about.)

            God remains yet currencies changes – but it is the current currency that is pursued and held in awe.

            So then, why is the primary reliance on the current currency?

Now there is no ‘cloud’ overhead to protect (as in the 40 years in the wilderness) nor clothing that never wears out (let alone that is always fashionable), and  Obamacare is no match for Almightycare.. (And even when there was a cloud, wrinkle wear out free clothing, & Almightycare – that wasn’t enough.)

            The fear of extinction and the anxiety of the future reinforce the delusion of more as the panacea.

            Man wants immortality which goes back to the Tree of Knowledge, Babel etc.  Acquisition (Cain in Hebrew) and it’s consequential derivative more – regardless of its failures in the material in yielding ‘immortality’ continues like a hamster on the wheel or in computer lingo a never ending ‘do loop.’

You can love a lot better with money than without it

Ellis Schwartz

            Neither marrying well nor going into the fetal position are answers relative to man’s never ending quest for the insularity of more – now that the cloud doesn’t hover over and protect, the clothing wears out, and the prospect of Obamacare is Obamian (think Nixonian).

I give you good leather. It’s up to you to make good shoes

Guirjieff

            Yet to assert faith alone, while ideal (and a failing of this writer), even accepting  enough (instead of more) is a) merely an enabler and b) culturally urinating in the wind. Yet there is one’s God given and demonstrated adaptability and resourcefulness which – we dismiss when the bravado subsides – which has and will secure – God willing- whatever the current currency.

            In the later years of this writer’s fee only personal financial planning practice, during the personal prospectus session (see Enough: A Handbook for Your Personal Financial Planning or the blog: healingfinancialanxiety.blogspot.com), I would ask the client to fill in the following:

Difficulty                    How You Overcame It           How It Proved Your Adapability

                                                                                    & Resourcefulness

            I’d ask them to list at least five.

            Then, the question would be posed, given your resilience proven by what you have overcome, how come – given you either have enough or are on track to enough and then some – you need more?

            After a series of “yeah, yeah, yeah but’s” (including ‘that was then, this is now – I’m older etc)–  too often the real answer was the belief in more money ‘as a cushion just in case – regardless of enough’ rather than themselves let alone ‘The Man Upstairs.’

           

            Finally, to make the point in context of effort: how much time has one spent on ‘of only’s’ versus ‘here are the difficulties, I’ve overcome and how I did it – which proves I can be adaptable and resourceful?

           

            There are no guarantees. Mutual Benefit Life had an A+++ rating and it went down. Standard & Poor’s gave securitized subprime mortgage loans AAA ratings and the bonds went down (and S&P still remains unscathed). Sammy Sosa had a corked bat.  There is no material answer guarantee: none.

But there is connection: connection through faith (proving faith through deeds),

continuing to connect to one’s assignment to refine his incompletions, connection via the company of dogs, and maybe understanding enough to tamp down the  intermittent (at best) anxiety & worry of more, more, more as the answer to fear of extinction.

            And that’s Inreach for Upreach as I Reach Down to give Her Royal Highness Goodie her belly rub.

           

1.- especially those titled 501c(4)’s with the words Patriot’ and “Tea Party”

2.- There is another interpretation: The ‘spies’ who went into observe Caanan really didn’t want to leave the desert (despite the kvetching of fellow tribes members) as all their material needs were met (food, shelter, clothing) and thus they were without worry and could focus just on the spiritual. I shall call this the The Spiritual Welfare State interpretation.